Mike Chen | Senior Writer | November 5, 2025
Everyone, it seems, is talking about large language models, or LLMs. No wonder, because publicly accessible LLM-driven chatbots like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot have revolutionized, well, everything. However, for businesses seeking to integrate AI into applications, LLMs aren’t always necessary—in fact, they may well be overkill. Enter the small language model. SLMs are lean, targeted AI models that are well suited for many use cases, including applications that run entirely on devices or systems that need access to sensitive internal data or extensive training to minimize hallucinations. Small language models have also become popular among research teams and academic groups that need custom models but lack the infrastructure or budget to build an LLM.
SLMs are language models that operate the same way that LLMs do but on a much smaller scale—SLMs tend to be 100 to 1,000 times smaller than most LLMs. Trainers can use smaller data sets requiring less training time, and the finished model is relatively cost-effective and manageable. Because an SLM can operate offline, it may be configured to be more secure than an LLM, and in production, inferencing times are generally faster. Many SLMs can run locally on phones, tablets, or edge devices.
SLMs are typically trained for a narrow set of tasks, often in one area of specialization, such as creating summaries of transcripts, translating simple user requests into code snippets, or handling sensitive information entirely in local environments to avoid cloud data transfers and improve compliance. Because SLMs can be fine-tuned or trained on proprietary data without leaving an organization’s secure environment, they may be less prone to errors or hallucinations compared to LLMs.
SLMs vs. LLMs: Efficiency and Scalability
SLMs and LLMs share development steps and core technical needs. The difference is scale—which affects everything from training to ongoing operations, including resource use and costs.
Most large language models contain hundreds of billions of parameters and have been trained on massive data sets for demanding jobs, such as public-facing chatbots. Deploying an LLM in-house requires significant computational resources, energy, data storage, and physical infrastructure. That’s why IT architects are turning to SLMs to provide specialized AI functionality in cases where an on-premises or cloud-based LLM isn’t necessary or practical. Because SLMs are designed for specific purposes, their training can be narrowed to a much smaller number of parameters—usually several billion or even hundreds of millions. When you compare that with hundreds of billions, it’s clear how an SLM is more manageable in terms of training, testing, deployment, and ongoing management.
SLMs vs. LLMs: Key Differences
| Element | SLM | LLM |
|---|---|---|
| Training | Domain-specific data sets with focused knowledge | Large data sets with broad knowledge |
| Model size | Model parameter counts usually between 100 million and 10 billion | Model parameters up to hundreds of billions or trillions |
| Infrastructure | Small enough to live on an edge or handheld device | Requires scalable, typically cloud-based processing to support massive data transfers |
| Training performance | Faster and less expensive to train because the model contains a limited number of elements | Expensive and time-consuming to train, requiring many specialized processors |
| Runtime performance | Fast inferencing without GPUs and runs on common end user hardware | Advanced servers, often with GPUs to speed parallel processing, needed for inferencing at scale |
| Security and compliance | Can keep sensitive data within an organization and perform processing on devices | Data leakage, compliance challenges, and threats from external data sourcing and transmission among the security risks at scale |
Key Takeaways
SLMs are trained, refined, and deployed using the same steps as LLMs, just on a much smaller scale. Key areas of focus include
SLMs can be a sensible choice when technical, regulatory, or operational limitations prevent the use of LLMs, or when an LLM’s broad capabilities aren’t required for the business need. SLMs also come with inherent benefits including faster inference, lower latency, greater deployment flexibility, and potentially fewer hallucinations. Like LLMs, SLMs can run in the cloud.
SLMs can help deliver AI locally despite hardware and power limitations and tight budgets. The following are some of the most common benefits of SLMs:
SLMs are often built for embedding into IoT/edge devices or integrating into software workflows. The following are some common examples of SLMs in action:
Like their bigger counterparts, LLMs, SLMs are still evolving. Here’s what’s just over the horizon:
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers right-sized compute options and a full range of managed AI services, making it ideal for developing, training, and deploying SLMs. OCI provides cost-efficient and scalable infrastructure that lets teams pay only for what they need. Multiple regions and data residency options provide global reach while addressing regulatory and compliance requirements, including AI sovereignty. Specialized OCI offerings are available for organizations that can’t migrate data to or use public cloud models. Advanced security features provide additional peace of mind.
While LLMs often capture more attention, SLMs are a key generative AI technology for specialized tasks, such as embedding language features in enterprise apps and providing on-device AI for phones and tablets. With OCI, teams can train, tune, and test SLMs, integrating them into runtimes designed for domain-specific expertise while staying within hardware and budget boundaries—bringing the benefits of AI to environments where LLMs aren’t practical.
Leaders know AI can deliver significant operational benefits via better processes, lower costs, and higher productivity. Small language models can extend these perks to more companies.
How are small language models fine-tuned for specific applications?
Fine-tuning an SLM involves customizing it to a specific task or domain with a focused data set (for example, customer support scripts or medical documents). SLMs can be trained and fine-tuned on cloud infrastructure using domain data, with parameters adjusted for the application’s priorities. A health application’s runtime, for example, doesn’t need to quote Shakespeare, and an email summary generator doesn’t need to know recent sports scores. The idea is to help the model learn specialized vocabulary, patterns, and context. Fine-tuning is particularly effective for SLMs, helping them overcome the limitations of their smaller capacity by focusing on specialized functions. However, trainers should be on guard for overfitting, where the model performs well on training data but poorly on new data because it fails to generalize.
What are the security implications of using small language models?
Training, tuning, and testing SLMs can be done efficiently in a secure cloud environment. When deployed on devices, SLMs may provide greater security benefits than LLMs since they don’t require external resources for inference. Additionally, because SLM runtimes are more focused in scope, organizations may find it easier to address regulatory and privacy requirements.